Comments on: AP’s Curley v Curley and News Corp’s Rupert v Rupert http://charman-anderson.com/2009/10/09/aps-curley-v-curley-and-news-corps-rupert-v-rupert/ Thoughts on social media, business and journalism from Suw and Kevin Charman-Anderson Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:13:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: This week in media musings: Obama v. Fox News, and NPR’s social media tact | Mark Coddington http://charman-anderson.com/2009/10/09/aps-curley-v-curley-and-news-corps-rupert-v-rupert/comment-page-1/#comment-2185 This week in media musings: Obama v. Fox News, and NPR’s social media tact | Mark Coddington Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:06:00 +0000 http://charman-anderson.com/2009/10/09/aps-curley-v-curley-and-news-corps-rupert-v-rupert/#comment-2185 [...] easy for Jeff Jarvis, who dismantles their assertions with a lesson on the collaboration economy. Suw Charman-Anderson also has fun with the contradictions between what they’re saying now and what they’ve [...] [...] easy for Jeff Jarvis, who dismantles their assertions with a lesson on the collaboration economy. Suw Charman-Anderson also has fun with the contradictions between what they’re saying now and what they’ve [...]

]]> By: Darren Hillock http://charman-anderson.com/2009/10/09/aps-curley-v-curley-and-news-corps-rupert-v-rupert/comment-page-1/#comment-2172 Darren Hillock Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:26:56 +0000 http://charman-anderson.com/2009/10/09/aps-curley-v-curley-and-news-corps-rupert-v-rupert/#comment-2172 Murdoch and Curley circa 2009 also ignore that more and more original news reporting is being done by new news organizations that have no print component. They seem to lump them in with the thieves and plagiarists, while Murdoch and Curley of years gone by seem liek they would have welcomed such developments. Murdoch and Curley circa 2009 also ignore that more and more original news reporting is being done by new news organizations that have no print component. They seem to lump them in with the thieves and plagiarists, while Murdoch and Curley of years gone by seem liek they would have welcomed such developments.

]]> By: Pim Van Hemmen http://charman-anderson.com/2009/10/09/aps-curley-v-curley-and-news-corps-rupert-v-rupert/comment-page-1/#comment-2170 Pim Van Hemmen Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:39:51 +0000 http://charman-anderson.com/2009/10/09/aps-curley-v-curley-and-news-corps-rupert-v-rupert/#comment-2170 Kevin, This is simply brilliant. Thank God for the internet and bloggers. How else would one be able to quickly find these contradictory statements over time and put them out there for international consumption? Pim Kevin,

This is simply brilliant. Thank God for the internet and bloggers. How else would one be able to quickly find these contradictory statements over time and put them out there for international consumption?

Pim

]]> By: News’ Forbidden City « BuzzMachine http://charman-anderson.com/2009/10/09/aps-curley-v-curley-and-news-corps-rupert-v-rupert/comment-page-1/#comment-2169 News’ Forbidden City « BuzzMachine Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:29:34 +0000 http://charman-anderson.com/2009/10/09/aps-curley-v-curley-and-news-corps-rupert-v-rupert/#comment-2169 [...] Except one might have heard these things some years ago … from Messrs. Curley and Murdoch themselves. Suw Charman-Anderson does a wonderful job making them eat their earlier words. [...] [...] Except one might have heard these things some years ago … from Messrs. Curley and Murdoch themselves. Suw Charman-Anderson does a wonderful job making them eat their earlier words. [...]

]]>