-
U.C. Berkeley student’s Twitter messages alerted world to his arrest in Egypt – ContraCostaTimes.comKevin: Via Ryan Sholin. If anyone asks you the value of Twitter, here is a good example from the world of activist communication in Egypt.
-
Kevin: Sarah Perez looks the time spent on ‘soical media’. Interesting conversation on the blog and here in the office about what ‘real people’ are.
Author Archives: Kevin Anderson
Twitter interviews on ReadWriteWeb
I already added the post Real People Don’t Have Time for Social Media on ReadWriteWeb to del.icio.us because it talks about participation inequalities and relative time spent by people on various social media sites and services. The post has kicked off an interesting discussion in the comments as well as at the office. But as a journalist, one thing caught my eye. Sarah Perez ‘interviewed’ people on Twitter about how they spend their time using social media. Now, obviously, this isn’t a broader sample of people who simply don’t participate, but it does give a snapshot of social media usage and a range of participation.
I’ve used it personally if I have a tech question I’m stymied by or want to get a range of views on a movie or a restaurant. Suw jokingly refers to it as a query for the ‘lazyweb’.
However, there is definitely something useful here journalistically. Sarah’s use of Twitter also shows how using the service not only as a way to promote your content but also to create community could be used to add to your journalism. No, it’s not a random sample. But since when are ‘man on the street’ interviews?
Technorati Tags: social media, social networking, Twitter
links for 2008-04-16
-
Kevin: Jeff Jarvis restates something that Suw often says: You don’t make money with a blog, you make money because of it. Jeff and Suw have created personal brands and businesses with their blogs.
-
Kevin: Jeff Jarvis talks about the press-sphere. ” I think newsrooms will need to be organized around topics or tags or stories.”
-
Kevin: Must read post on blog and online journalism success metrics. I like the idea of a ‘loyalty index’. Regular readers. Original reporting. Getting people to comment, sign up for the RSS feed or get involved in other ways.
-
Suw: I wish that more people in Stage 2 would just, y’know, shut up.
-
Kevin: Tim Robbins gives a modern version of Newton Minnow’s Vast Wasteland or possibly Network. The activist actor takes broadcasters and US leadership to task. Shame on the NAB for turning off the cameras. Irony?
Real-time innovation in news organisations
Ryan Sholin has started a great conversation about how to create cultural change at newspapers.
The important part of the job isn’t speaking to the first 20 people on the conference call for an hour, it’s maintaining contact with the one person on the call who has the potential to Get It: Moving from the Paper business to the News business isn’t as simple as picking up a different skillset; it’s about changing the mindset of journalists.
It reminded me of a question I’m often asked about cultural change: How do you turn journalists into bloggers? The simple answer is that I don’t. I find journalists who happen to be bloggers or who show an interest in blogging, give them all the technical and editorial support that I can, and then I try to share that knowledge and success around the organisation.
How do I spot a good blogger? I ask whether the journalist is already aware of other bloggers writing in their beat. I try to determine whether they are willing to engage with other bloggers and people who comment on their posts. In short, are they ready to join the conversation?
Sharing the success stories helps spread the culture. As David Anderson of Fairfax Digital in Australia told me recently, you need success stories to tell your managers, and I would say that you also need success stories to win over journalists, who are professional sceptics. You have to spread culture up and down the organisation.
I’ve been fortunate. At the BBC, I had support at all levels for digital experimentation and, when I came to London, it was great to see evangelism from people like Richard Sambrook, the head of the Global News Division. At the Guardian, we’ve got digital evangelists all the way up to The Editor’s office. However, both the BBC and the Guardian still grapple with cultural change. And I couldn’t agree with Ryan more when he says you can’t mandate change from the top down.
Anyone who has worked with me will attest that sometimes I get frustrated at the pace of change in the industry. I really thought digital journalism would be further along by now than we are. The dot.com crash wiped out a lot of talent in the industry and set us back years. And I’ve crossed swords with a fair number of nay sayers. I’m not sure there is much we can do for the close-minded, and the need for change is urgent enough that arguing with the Andrew Keens in the industry just isn’t worth your or my time.
Industry scale change will only come with time. The industry is struggling because the depth of digital culture is still too thin and still so new. Don’t sweat that. Don’t even try changing your organisation wholesale. We might have the experience, but as Steve Yelvington says, we still don’t have the political capital. Many of you will run into middle management who ‘own’ the bureaucracy and have an investment in the status quo. They’ve spent several years supporting the Andrew Keens because it protected their position and power. Now, they have a new strategy: They are fighting over who owns change rather than focusing on actually creating change. While they’re fighting, us digital journalists need to get on with it:
- Start small with an event or story-based project.
- Bring the cost of the project down as close to zero as possible from a technical standpoint. Use open-source or free net-based services.
- Try one new multimedia story-telling feature or engagement feature with each project.
- Debrief. Learn. Repeat.
This is based in part on my interpretation of the Newspaper Next project. As Steve Yelvington says:
We need to think of making things that are good enough and not overshooting. We’re taking too long to create ‘perfect ‘ systems that don’t meet needs. We over-invest, over-plan and then we stick with the bad business plan until it all collapses. Come up with a good idea and field test. Fail forward and fail cheaply. Failure is not a bad thing if we learn from our mistakes and correct. Be patient to scale. Impatient for profits.
This is real-time innovation. Try journalistic projects with existing tools and learn journalistically and technically from that. That takes zero development and relatively little time. It’s about editorial creativity, not about development cycles or budgets. If you find something that works, then you know where to focus product development. What can you do with Twitter, blogging software, YouTube, Seesmic or FriendFeed to create a journalistic project and help build your audience?
links for 2008-04-14
-
Kevin: Suw is a huge fan of QR codes, bar codes that can be read by mobile phones that can have embedded text or URLs. Can they succeed where the Cue Cat failed?
-
Kevin: Eight mistakes that lead to special section failure. Get linky and reach out to bloggers.
-
Kevin: Ryan Sholin posts about how to change the culture from newspaper to news. Focus on supporting change agents not changing the entire culture in one go.
links for 2008-04-11
-
Kevin: Via Martin Stabe. A great list of must read posts for J-School grads by Jack Lail. Most of them reinforce the idea that grads need new heroes.
links for 2008-04-10
-
Suw: It’s not entirely clear to me that blogging causes death, but this article does illustrate the almost perverse rewarding of unhealthy behaviours, especially in terms of gaining kudos and status. Wrong sort of willy-waving, chaps!
-
Kevin: Mark Glaser throws down a challenge. He worries that news organisations are almost paralysed talking about change. All Talk, No Action=ATNA. He lists a series of iniatives, and projects move this talk into action.
-
Kevin: Fred Wilson with a great post from both the position of a VC and a user. Internet giants are buying up great services and then letting the services languish.
Are we the signal or the noise?
I recorded this video for a project that the Guardian is doing with Current TV. I recorded it after reading a post by a friend and one of my heroes
, Steve Yelvington, in the wake of the recent conflagration over Barack Obama and his former pastor Jeremiah Wright. Steve asked whether we were listening. We could be interpreted as journalists, politicians, pundits as well as the public.
Today I see journalism falling into two traps. One is the passive abandonment of responsibility that sometimes comes along with the “objective” mode, and the other is the crass exploitation of divisive opportunities that you see from infotainers like Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Lou Dobbs.
And that brings us back to my point. Is anyone listening? And is the press helping us all listen? Are we working to further understanding?
Or are journalists just parroting words and perpetuating the racial divide that has scarred this country throughout its history?
It’s one of the things that many journalists don’t do enough of when they blog: Listen. That’s one of the important skills for a blogging journalist. Blogging is not just publishing my thoughts. I can do that in any old media. Blogging is about the conversation.
Why I’ve chosen to do the kind of journalism I do is that I see great potential in being able to foster civic discussion and participation using the internet. It hearkens to the ideals of journalism that I learned as a j-school student. I really don’t understand why more journalists don’t see it.
As I said in the video and the discussion that followed on Current, I want to find ways to expand who is taking part in these discussions and actually explore important issues. As a journalist, I can add some reporting to provide a for some of the issues, which isn’t to say that the participants can’t add their own reporting. There is such scope to explore the issues of the day and be in a constant, rolling, evolving conversation. It’s exciting territory to explore.
But too often, either through neglect or active provocation, the media are turning these online spaces into brawls. It’s not surprising. It mirrors talk radio, cable news shouting matches and some bizarre version of Jerry Springer for intellectuals. The media is just turning the internet into what it knows. Bring on the noise.
But isn’t good journalism supposed to amplify the signal, find it in the noise? Aren’t journalists supposed to help find the important data points, turning points to help people and themselves make sense of the world? It’s an abdication of our professional responsibility if we stop trying to find the signal and become the noise.
That’s not going to save our profession. It’s not going to help use cut through the clutter in this very busy media landscape. But it’s easier to try to shout above the crowd than to find the wisdom in it. It’s easier to be provocative than to be thought provoking. I don’t have much time for it, and increasingly, neither do our former audiences.
links for 2008-04-05
-
Kevin: Via Romenesko. I’ve written about this before. The terms of Zell’s buyout of Tribune Co were over-leveraged. They will have to spin off other properties and hope that the newspaper business doesn’t deteriorate more or risk default in as soon as 18
-
Kevin: Alf Hermida writes from the Online Journalism Symposium. James Maroney of Belo and the Dallas Morning News says: “If you are I the newspaper business, you are in the business of managing decline. If you are I the news and information business, then
-
Kevin: Great reporting and compelling story telling from This American Life about the expansion of executive branch power under the Bush administration and the concept of the ‘unitary executive’. Anecdotes backed up with clear legal explanations.
links for 2008-04-04
-
Kevin: A new study finds that staff-produced blogs at newspapers create little discussion on issues.
-
Suw: And who will write today’s code? I know a number of companies who can’t find good develeopers, despite being immersed in the dev community. That’s affecting innovation and productivity right now. Can we even wait for school kids to grow up?