Social technology and civil society

I’ve just started a research project for Carnegie UK Trust looking at the way in which civil society associations are using social technology to communicate, collaborate and organise. This is a three month project during which we will cover three main areas:

  • An examination of the current use of social technology by civil society organisations
  • An exploration of what the future may hold, how social technology might evolve over the next fifteen years
  • A set of ideas and recommendations for civil society organisations to help them make the most of social technology

I will be writing about as much of this research as I can and hope that by doing so, we can collectively explore some of the ideas, assumptions and issues that I uncover.

My first question for you is this:

Which civil society organisations are doing the best job of using social and/or new media to fulfil their remit?

To dig a little deeper into what we mean by “civil society organisations”, Carnegie UK Trust have provided this as part of their definition of “civil society”:

Civil Society as associational life. Civil society is the ‘space’ of organised activity not undertaken by either the government or for-private-profit business. It includes formal and informal associations such as: voluntary and community organisations, trade unions, faith-based organisations, co-operatives and mutuals, political parties, professional and business associations, philanthropic organisations, informal citizen groups and social movements. Participation in or membership of such organisations is voluntary in nature.

If we take that as a working definition, it’s pretty broad, so we can be very inclusive. As for the definition of “social and/or new media”, I think at a minimum we should be looking at organisations that are utilising any of these tools:

  • Social networking sites (third party or bespoke)
  • Blogs
  • Twitter, Identica or other micro-conversation tools
  • Wikis
  • Social bookmarking
  • Forums, bulletin boards, or other thread-based communications tools
  • Audio, whether stand-alone streams/downloads, podcasts, or other digital formats
  • Video, whether stand-alone streams/downloads, videocasts or on video sharing sites
  • Photo sharing sites
  • Virtual worlds
  • Multimedia, whether online or CD-ROMs
  • Interactive television
  • The mobile web in any way

That’s a pretty long list, so there should be plenty of organisations and individuals out there who are doing good work in this arena. So, who are they? And what are they doing? Although the main focus of this research is UK organisations, we are interested in exemplars from around the world, so if someone abroad is doing something amazingly stunning, then they count!

6 thoughts on “Social technology and civil society

  1. Hi, Suw.

    Would Be2camp – – fit into your definition of a civil society organisation? Very definitely not-for-profit, voluntary, etc and trying to push the envelope as far as social media is concerned for people working in, or affected by those working in, the architecture, engineering, construction and FM sectors.

    Regards, Paul

  2. Yishay, thanks for that – will take a look!

    Hey Paul, yes, Be2Camp counts! I’ll add it to my list. 😀

  3. I’ve been impressed with the efforts of @YouthNetUK on Twitter.

  4. Hi Suw

    Compass using social tools to support and find new ideas is good.

    SiCamp ( though only technically using a blog and twitter is a good example. I think the key with SIC is how they approach “new media” holistically as a community rather than a set of specific tools.

  5. Hi Suw, been interested to hear your progress on all of this. There is definately a rise here of usage here in the UK especially in the last year alone and there are many great examples of orgs out there to be found.

    Not sure if you were aware, but a report (mainly US based) conducted by NTEN, Common Knowledge, and ThePort has been just released and can be downloaded as a pdf at which contains some useful insights and figures too.

Comments are closed.