-
Kevin: David Sasaki who I met through Global Voices has a great post on motivations for being Open – both with software and content. For those of you who get paid to create content and wonder why people do it for free, read this post.
-
Suw: A lesson here, I think, for anyone presenting at a conference. Wouldn’t conferences be so much more interesting of presenters didn’t just stand there and drone on?
Author Archives: Kevin Anderson
links for 2007-12-10
-
Kevin: Antony Mayfield asks: Makes me wonder what the role of a union is in this age for journalists. Should it be to focus on employers and policies or ways of encouraging journalistic enterprise? It’s in the wake of the NUJ Multimedia Working Commission
-
Kevin: Neil McIntosh reviews the NUJ’s Commission on Multimedia Working report. He says it’s a step in the right direction but is also concerned that it still contains the Code on ‘Witness Contributors’.
-
Kevin: Suw and I experienced this first hand recently with Virgin Media. Corporations can record our conversations with nothing more than a fig leaf of a disclaimer, but when we record conversations, we’re denied. There can’t be one law for companies and
-
Kevin: A podcast sceptic lists on MediShift gives reasons why she thinks that podcasts haven’t taken off. Too long. Unfocused. Good content hard to find. Hard to manage. Hard to ‘skim’. I didn’t listen much to podcasts until I got my iPod.
links for 2007-12-08
-
Suw: Excellent piece on productivity paradigms and how old school time-and-motion attitudes clash with web-based ways of working and being.
-
Suw: Title should read “Corporate bloggers create echo chamber as comfort blanket; refuse to accept criticism or talk to any real experts out there”. Read, and cringe. Oh, and notice lack of comments on their ‘blog’. Oh, the irony.
-
Suw. The problem with E2 in the corp environment: “people who use the new tools heavily — who post frequently to an internal blog, edit the corporate wiki a lot […] — will be perceived as not spending enough time on their ‘real’ jobs.”
-
Suw: How do teleworkers prove they’re working? “Workstreaming, the publishing of work-related activities and events to your remote colleagues, usually via RSS.” Hm, if you have to prove you’re working, you’re in the wrong job.
-
Suw: In short: Theory X = people are all lazy buggers; Theory Y = people may be self-motivated. An old theory, but relevant to the busy/bursty view and Enterprise 1.0 vs Enterprise 2.0.
-
Suw: Some completely wrong-headed thinking. Tools enable behaviours (you can’t cut with a fork, but you can with a knife); changing behaviour slowly changes culture. You can’t change culture without the right tools to support new behaviours.
-
Suw: Leisa Reichelt’s seminal post on ambient intimacy.
links for 2007-12-07
-
Kevin: Tours of Times and FT newsrooms give tips on how to spread the future in your newsroom. FT master classes over lunch. FT also builds story throughout the day online, not waiting for print.
-
Kevin: Thanks to Steve Petersen of Bivings for the link. Tom Curley of AP talks about future sources of revenue and states that breaking news is a premium business. He also argues that local news is a business model to grow.
-
Suw: I couldn’t agree with Deb (and therefore, Seth) more. PR people: Do not hunt me – I am not a creature to be captured and killed.
links for 2007-12-04
-
Kevin: Umair says: “Facebook’s DNA was built for the massconomy. Unfortunately, Facebook is at the forefront of the edgeconomy. This fundamental strategic mismatch is why Facebook’s problems are growing – and will continue to accelerate.”
-
Kevin: Steve Karp says that Facebook got it so wrong with Beacon, their ad network because “it’s acting like a traditional media company with monopoly control of its channel.” But how many other media companies behave this way? Almost all of them.
-
Kevin: Jeff Jarvis sets the record straight. This isn’t about us versus them, professional journalists versus bloggers or citizen journalists. It’s collaborative, which is why the term networked journalism is not only more used these days but also more ap
-
Kevin: How much data are we willing to put in the ‘clouds’? Interesting article about cloud computing. This is really an old extension of the client-server model, this time looking at distributed storage and services.
-
Kevin: What a great edition for a real estate section, a blog written by a couple building their dream home. Brilliant idea and well done. Lots of quality comments and a good sense of community here.
-
Kevin: FCC clearance of aspects of Sam Zell’s Tribune deal are the easy part. The heavily leveraged deal now looks more than optimistic. Zell is left looking for ways to extract more revenue from the sale of the Chicago Cubs.
-
Kevin: Looking at whether e-Ink could swing newspapers back into the black. I’m sceptical. But in this article, cutting print costs could save a hypothetical newspaper 38% of its revenues. But that’s assuming similar reach and revenues.
-
Kevin: Roy Greenslade, one of our best bloggers at the Guardian, is always a winner in my mind, but in this case, Roy is given kudos for great blog design and readability on the iPhone. An unforeseen benefit of our redesign earlier this year.
-
Kevin: New York Times reports on how the Associated Press is reorganising for a 24-hours news cycle and multimedia working in a move called the “Digital Cooperative”.
Embracing the limitations and possibilities of the web
Mark Friesen at NewsDesigner.com pointed out a brilliant post by Khoi Vinh in August that I missed in my hundreds of feeds. Khoi is the design director at the New York Times and was writing about the differences between print and online design.
The original post was pitched at designers, but I think it’s equally important reading for editors, both in print and broadcast as they approach the web. It’s probably uncontroversial to say that editors get what they want, and sometimes coming to the web from another medium, they get something suited for print or television that is poorly suited for online audiences. It’s not unsurprising that TV sites still suffer an over-reliance on Flash because the animation reminds them of their home medium, and most print sites suffer from an altogether too literal translation from print to the web.
For designers, he suggests learning HTML and CSS before diving into Flash because:
(Flash) leads too easily to the assumption that a similar amount of authorial control can be exerted in online design as can be achieved offline — which is a fallacy.
Print editors do not realise that the level of control they exert on the printed page is almost impossible to exert on the web, and sometimes trying to exert that control gets in the way of thinking about the possibilities of the web as opposed to its limitations. It’s sad to say that in 2007, we’re still doing too much shoveling of content onto web sites and too little of creating content best suited for the web.
Khoi says it this way:
The prerequisite for doing something meaningful with any of these skills — HTML, CSS, Flash or whatever — is first embracing the medium as something different from print. Indeed, there’s no point in learning these skills unless as a print designer you’ve made a prior shift in your understanding of how design works in digital media. Specifically, come to grips with the fact that, on the Web, design is not a method for implementing narrative, as it is in print, but rather it’s a method for making behaviors possible.
Coming to the web, he says designers, and I would say, editors are too focused on fixing type faces, point sizes, while “ignoring usability and expediency”. The way that I put it is that most editors think the web is a magical place where Harry Potters wave their magic wands and anything is possible. It’s really a lot more like the Matrix, rules can be bent and some broken, but most of the time, it’s about being creative within those rules.
But there is one line that from Khoi’s post that stuck out. In the closing paragraph, he encourages designers to experiment “to begin understanding how a page is put together, how it is delivered to a browser, how it behaves and, crucially, how the designer’s intention maps to how it is used by real people.” We’re still making basic mistakes in building news sites, lessons that we learned in late 90s but might have been lost in the dot.com bust.
- News sites should be designed around the information needs of your users not your desk structure, org chart or programme schedule.
- Design is important, but we also need to consider information architecture. What’s that? Jesse James Garrett says: “Information Architecture: Stuctural design of the information space to facilitate intuitive access to content.”
- Editors should sit in on a user-testing session. We build the sites and know them inside out. Our users don’t have that inside knowledge.
Sitting in on user-testing is humbling and enlightening. It starts to break down our own notions of how we use our sites and replaces them with how users navigate our sites or in many cases fail to find the information they want. It might even surprise editors about the kind of information readers want.
Khoi ends with another way of putting the importance of mindset as well as skillset:
Without that basic sense of curiosity, that insatiable desire to experiment and understand new ways of doing everything, the Web isn’t much fun at all, regardless of how much experience a designer has under her belt.
Curiosity and passion. The web isn’t print, and it isn’t television. It’s something different, and it’s an amazing, incomparable place to do journalism.
Technorati Tags: design, information architecture, news
links for 2007-12-03
-
Suw: A lawyer does what lawyers usually do when it comes to blogging: talk bullshit about stuff they know nothing about. From the comments: “1999 called and it wants its internet policy back.”
links for 2007-12-02
-
Suw: Leisa has a spot-on post about how banks (and websites) simultaneously tell us to be responsible regarding our security whilst irresponsibilly luring us into bad behaviours. Should be compulsory reading for all web developers and bank managers.
-
Suw: Great article by Cory on how Facebook is digging its own grave. I couldn’t agree more.
links for 2007-11-30
-
Kevin: New York Times announces layoffs and a hiring freeze. It will also examine its coverage priorities.
-
Kevin: It says what it does on the tin. Easy blog design for all of those CSS-challenged among us.
-
Kevin: Ryan Sholin lists five sites and services that can allow news sites to begin innovation today. Not tomorrow after you sign off a deal or buy in consultants or developers. Now. This is a much overlooked part of Web 2.0 innovation.
-
Kevin: Benjamin Melançon asks: What’s to stop us from doing cool things with geotagged news with Drupal or other existing free software tools? Good question.
links for 2007-11-29
-
Kevin: This was a dumb, poorly financed deal based on a best case scenario that never was going to happen. With the sub-prime meltdown hitting real estate and classified ads, it’s only going to get worse.
-
Kevin: Steve Outing shares lessons from the Enthusiast Group’s effort to launch outdoor sports focused community groups. In the end, they have closed the business, but they have learned a lot about media, community and UGC.