-
Kevin: Steve Outing pierces some of the recent (and largely recycled) talk about micropayments and news content. As Online Journalism Blogger Paul Bradshaw says, newspaper content isn't like iTunes. You listen to songs several times, you don't read newspaper content several times. But Steve looks at a new model, Kachingle. Briefly, Kachingle takes the US National Public Radio voluntary supporter model with a model that allows users to reward content providers they like and not just traditional media but also bloggers. Steve goes through the details. It's a new idea. Will it work? Dunno. But it might be worth trying.
-
Kevin: Lisa Williams of Placeblogger writes about how journalists, just as technology workers before them, can survive and thrive as big companies fail. She writes: "You'll discover what thousands upon thousands of tech workers discovered: you can do great work outside of an institutional, big-company context, and you can make a living doing so. High tech companies didn't own innovation; the innovators did. News organizations don't own journalism: journalists do."
-
Kevin: Dan Lyons behind the Fake Steve Jobs talks about his time of obsessive blogging, and Robert X. Cringely writes: "We're at the end of one era on the blogosphere and the beginning of another. What the new one will be like nobody can say. Will the amateurs fade away and leave the game to people who actually know how to write and report? Or will the marketers complete their coup, leaving the rest of us old journos to scramble for jobs at Wal-Mart?"
links for 2009-02-12
-
Kevin: Chris O'Brien talks about location-based services and Google's new Latitute. He writes: "my concern is that it will take any of these location-based services years to attain the critical mass that would make them truly useful." It's a good piece that looks at the services, recognises the privacy issues but talks about the hurdles for their widespread adoption.
-
Kevin: I know that this isn't journalism related, but I'm going to start collecting stories about the financial crisis. This talks about the amount of 'goodwill' or intangible assets on bank balance sheets. In the bust, these 'assets' (sneer quotes intended) may be worth nothing and therefore require even greater capatilisation to support the banks than is currently estimated. It's ugly in the US, and it's even uglier in Europe. CDO and US subprime exposures are not the only issue for European banks. They have even higher levels of goodwill assets on their books.
-
Kevin: After the much reported comments about Twitter's possible money making idea of charging 'brands' for their use of the micro-blogging platform, Kara Swisher reads between the lines of a Biz Stone blog post on possible avenues Twitter might take. She seems (and probably rightfully so) snarkily suspicious about any plans that Twitter has to actually make money. Is Twitter's only really strategy to become too big to fail and then get bailed out/acquired by a bigger company? If GOOG buys 'em, will Twitter become yet another service that the search giant buys and then neglects?
-
Kevin: Matt Davis, director of news agency DataNews, said that the BBC could be 'the Freedom of Information Act's first major scalp' as its spending is made public'. Davis says that it will lead to inevitable trimming of the corporation's budget.
Guardian election road trip review: Geo-tagging
With the inauguration of Barack Obama as president of the United States now well behind us, I thought I’d take (a long overdue) look back at the road trip that I took during the US elections for The Guardian and talk about some of the things we tried in terms of innovations in coverage and what I learned from it.
This is the third trip that I’ve taken for the US elections. In 2000, I took a trip with BBC Washington correspondent Tom Carver. Webcasts were the thing of the day, and we took a portable satellite dish and a DV video camera to webcast live or as-live (recorded but treated as live). We answered a range of questions covering topics suggested by our global audience. In 2004, I took another trip with BBC News Online colleague Richard Greene. The trip was my introduction to blogging, and it set the path for my career for the last five years.
The common thread through all of these trips has been an attempt to engage the audience in new ways and field test new digital journalism techniques. Over a series of posts I’ll talk about some of the things that we did for US Election trip 2008.
Geotagging
As I mentioned last summer, one of the things that I wanted to try was geo-tagging. I was inspired by the GPS and geo-tagging function in my Nokia N82 to add this to our coverage. The camera in the N82 is stellar. With a 5 megapixel sensor and a brilliant Xenon flash, it is one of the best features in the phone. (I’d be interested in seeing what the new N85 has to offer, apart from the OLED screen. ZDNet has a review.) I’m going to focus on geo-tagging in this post and talk more about mobile newsgathering with the N82 and other smartphones in another post.
As good as the camera is on the N82, I knew that there would be times when I needed Suw’s Nikon D70, a proper D-SLR with interchangeable lenses. But how to add the geo-data? Dan Chung, award-winning photographer and digital innovator at the Guardian, and I had played around with a geo-tagging device from Sony, the GPS-CS1.
A geo-tagger at its most basic has a GPS radio and some memory. It records your location either every so often or after you move a certain distance. It’s not physically connected to the D-SLR in any way, but it does require you to sync the clock from the geo-tagger with the clock in your D-SLR. To add the geo-data to your photos, all you have to do is import the photos to your computer and import the GPS logs from your geo-tagger. Software then compares the time that the photo was taken with your GPS logs and merges the geo-data into the EXIF files of the photos. Newer high-end cameras such as the D200 have GPS add-on units (the GP-1), and point-and-shoot cameras like the P6000 have integrated GPS.
Dan had me test the Song geo-tagger a couple of years ago, and I wasn’t that impressed. It didn’t acquire the satellites very quickly, and Sony didn’t officially support non-Sony cameras. But although the accuracy wasn’t brilliant, the idea is sound.
I looked around and settled on GiSTEQ CD110BT. It has a sensitive MTK chipset with 51-channel tracking, and I found the accuracy to be frighteningly good. The GPS track plotted on Google Earth actually shows when I changed lanes in my rental car. The Sony could take minutes to acquire the satellite, but from a cold start, the GiSTEQ usually got a lock in less than a minute. A synthesised voice says “Satellites fixed” when it’s got a lock. To conserve power, it will shut itself off but wake when moved or vibrated. I carried it around my neck on a lanyard or in the pocket of my camera bag when I was out and about. A supplied light adhesive patch kept it on my dashboard while driving. The unit also comes with both mains (AC) and car chargers.
That’s the good. The bad is that while GiSTEQ says CD110BT will work on PCs and Macs, mine didn’t out of the box. It required a firmware update to work with a Mac, and the firmware updater only works on PCs and didn’t like Windows XP running on Parallels virtualisation software. Fortunately, my friend Andy Carvin at NPR gave me five minutes on his PC to update the firmware, but even after that, I had difficulty getting the device to consistently download data. GiSTEQ has since released a new update that they say fixes this. I downloaded some GPS logs tonight without a hitch.
I’d like to try the Amod AGL3080 (review in Wired), which is touted as a driverless geo-tagger. It simply mounts as an external drive on Mac or PC, and all you need to do is copy the data from it. It uses a highly accurate SiRF III chipset. Unlike the GiSTEQ which is charged via the USB cable, the Amod runs on three AAA batteries. Kevin Jaako has a thorough review of it on his blog.
The software that comes with the GiSTEQ promises a lot and delivers most of it without too much fuss. It’s actually rebranded software from JetPhoto, and as the company says on its site, you don’t actually need a specialised geo-tagger. There are several Garmin or Magellan GPS units that will work with it. The software also works quite nicely with the N82, instantly recognising that the photos already have geo-data embedded in the files. If the geo-data is off, the software has a nice interface to relocate and update the geo-data. It also has a built-in Flickr uploader, although it could be a bit more intuitive and work more seamlessly with Flickr title and description fields.
But I didn’t just geo-tag my photos. I also geo-tagged my tweets using Twibble, a geo-aware Twitter app Nokia S60 phones. Twibble integrates seamlessly with the GPS on the N82. It also allows you to upload pictures you’ve taken with the phone directly to TwitPic. We just used this all to great effect for Guardian Travel’s first TwitTrip with Benji Lanyado. It is pretty heavy on the battery, but I had a power inverter in the car so everything was fully charged all the time. It was also a bonus to have Nokia and Google Maps on the phone for navigation.
I also geo-tagged all of my blog posts. I either took the geo-data from a Tweet or a photo, or if I didn’t have any geo-data handy, I used sites like Geo-tag.de or Tinygeocoder.com to generate geo-data from an address.
Visualising the trip
Thanks to a quick bit of python scripting by Guardian colleague Simon Willison, I have a KML file for all of the 2059 photos that I took over the more than 4000 miles of the trip. One of the reasons that I wanted to geo-tag pictures, posts and tweets was that while I know most of these towns, I wanted to give a global audience a sense of place.
But apart from easily visualising the trip, why all the fuss to do this? Adding geo-data to content is one of those fundamental enabling technological steps. It opens up a world of possibilities for your content. By geo-tagging your content, it allows users to subscribe to content based on location. Geo-tag your movie and restaurant reviews, and you can start leveraging emerging location-based services on mobile phones. With Google Maps on mobile and other mapping services, news organisations could provide real-time location based information. Geo-data allows users to navigate your content by location instead of more traditional navigation methods.
Some companies are already dipping their toes into geo-data. Associated Press stories hosted on Google News have a small inset Google Map inset based on the location information in the dateline. New York Times stories appear on Google Earth. But datelines are imprecise because they are city-based, but when you pull up more accurate data you can do much more. You can see the possibilities of mapped information on Everyblock.com.
But to get from most news sites to Everyblock, you’ve got to put in the foundational work both on the technical side and the journalistic workflow. Having said that, it’s not rocket science. It might seem a lot of work up front, but once the work is done, geo-data provides many opportunities, some of which could provide new revenue streams.
links for 2009-02-11
-
Kevin: Just in time for Valentine's Day, suggestions to save the newspaper industry. Page One Girls plus edible pages. My personal favourite is the ch'i sucking micropayment system.
-
Suw: Some really fabulous data visualisation work. I particularly love the Britain From Above suff. Not just fascinating, but beautiful too.
-
Kevin: Michael Kinsley founding editor of Slate on the folly of micro-payments and news. He not only spikes the idea of micro-payments, but he also talks about the supply and demand issues in terms of content and news.
-
Kevin: Looking at some of the Silicon Valley startups and companies that are doing well in the recession. The companies include virtual malls, social networks, spam and spyware filter companies. It's interesting to look for patterns in the companies that are weathering this downturn.
-
Kevin: My colleague Keith Stuart writes a nice eight step guide to how to develop iPhone apps. It reminds me of watching Olympic skiing. He makes it look and sound so easy.
-
Kevin: Martin Stabe asks on Twitter: "how have I missed this brilliant site?" From the About page of the blog: Information Aesthetics is designed and maintained by Andrew Vande Moere, a Senior Lecturer at the Design Lab at the Faculty of Architecture, Design and Planning of the University of Sydney, Australia. His research interests include data visualization and visual design, from traditional screen-based interfaces, over "media architecture", to more explorative, artistic and wearable applications. His teaching comprises interaction design, physical/wearable computing and 3D real-time multimedia.
links for 2009-02-10
-
Kevin: Clayton Christensen and the disruptive-innovation crew from Harvard — who developed the NewspaperNext program with the American Press Institute — struggle to get us to understand how and why simple, low-end, inadequate, "junk" products and services so often topple the big guys.
-
Kevin: This is a very interesting piece that raises a lot of questions about columnists and abuse. I'd really like there to be a clearer differentiation between columnists and journalists. I think this piece slightly blurs the lines between the two. As far as I can tell, this piece is about columnists and a former Gawker blogger. But maybe I'm holding too closely to the US separation of columns and reporting. The comments are very much worth reading. The one thing I would say is that columnists are often shocked by the tone of the 'debate'. However, if you read the columns, they don't set the stage for a debate but rather seem written solely to provoke a reaction. Again, read the comments if you're running a comment site. They make some reasonable and very valid points.
-
Kevin: A good analysis by the folks at Bivings of the top 10 best US newspaper sites (from the top 100 newspapers in the States by circulation.) There are some good mentions in the comments from sites that don't fit those criteria. Check out the WikiJax feature at Jacksonville. It's an interesting innovation. I wonder if we wouldn't increase newspaper usage if we explained our features better. Of course, the best features and web sites explain themselves.
-
Kevin: Let the British media iPhone app rush begin. The one thing to note in this release is how ITN will enable offline video access.
-
Kevin: BitTorrent site Pirate Bay has just released a Google Maps mashup showing their worldwide user base. Janko Roettgers has some good analysis of the numbers. It's just a snapshot in time. It's also interesting to see where BitTorrent, or at least Pirate Bay, isn't used widely such as Africa and the Middle East.
-
Kevin: Some great sources of where to follow the Australian Bushfires via social media. I've been using a search based filter on Tweetdeck to follow the fires.
-
Kevin: I usually find mobile trend watchers in denial about the industry. They focus on handset manufacturers and ignore the speed bump/impregnable road block that the carriers are. But this trend list for '09 seems reasonable. I think we're finally seeing some movement in terms of Location Based Services. Apps are finally breaking the on-deck strangehold carriers used to have in terms of mobile data. Definitely worth a look.
Barriers to innovation
This video, made by a team at NASA as part of a project to shake up the overly bureaucratic culture there, is spot on, not just for NASA but for so many businesses.
links for 2009-02-09
-
Kevin: An interesting project by (mostly) conservative groups (Heritage Foundation, National Taxpayers Union, Club for Growth, RedState, tcot Twitter group) in the US about the economic stimulus. Whatever the political alignment or political motivation, they are releasing not only the bill and amendments but also releasing the data in Excel and Google docs format.
-
One of the chief reasons online news vets like myself get frustrated by wacky suggestions from people like Peter "Google is the enemy" Osnos and Walter "Hey! Let's collect money from readers!" Isaacson is because, well, it's not like these…
links for 2009-02-07
-
I first started blogging back in 2007. But did you ever know that I ran and still do so solely using my phone ? My first blog was Aviation Sri Lanka (
-
The easiest way to create an interactive timeline gadget for Google Spreadsheets or iGoogle
How to tell if your social media consultant is a lemon
Dave Fleet has a great blog post about how to pick a social media marketing consultant, after a blog post by Ike Pigott calling into question the knowledge of the new flock of “social media consultants” who seem to have crawled out of the woodwork over the last six months.
[W]e have a glut of people selling their expertise on how you should handle “the Twitter community” who have zero experience using the service the way most people do. They hopped on board the Consultancy Express, went straight to the head of the line, and now want to tell you how to talk to people at all of the stops they skipped.
Like Dave and Ike, I have reservations about the way that it seems to have suddenly become fashionable to be a “social media consultant”. As Dave says:
I don’t know about you, but I’m sick of seeing people sign up for Twitter, follow ten thousand people (many of whom follow back) to build a substantial following, then start spouting advice as though followers equals expertise. Some of them are experts, for sure. Others, however, seem to have little beyond a big mouth to back their words up.
Almost as annoying, but just as dangerous, are the hordes of traditional practitioners that have realized they need to include social media in their pitches nowadays, but have no experience whatsoever using those tools.
I have been wanting to write a post like this for months now, but had been holding off because I was a bit worried that I’d end up sounding as If I was criticising people simply for being new. We all have to start somewhere, after all, but social media is experiential, which means if you haven’t experienced it then you really don’t know what you’re talking about.
That said, I lost a job to a guy who had giant red flashing text on his blog, and that was two or three years ago. (Funnily, not only did they tell me “he’s a blog expert recommended by one of our directors, they also told me “we’ll get back to you if we ever need any help with social media.” D’oh.) So experience alone doesn’t guarantee that you’re going to get good advice, because there are some people around who have been successfully spouting crap for years.
Dave offers up these questions to help you winnow out the wheat from the chaff when looking for a social media marketing consultant:
1. Can you give me an example of social media work you’ve completed for a client recently?
2. How do you go about pitching bloggers?
3. How do you monitor what people are saying about you?
4. Where can I find you online?
5. Can you (ghost) write my blog for me?
6. How do you measure results?
7. How would you define social media?
8. Can you just pretend to be me online?
Now, some of these work just as well if you’re looking for an expert to help with internal communications and collaboration, but I’d like to offer up my own list.
So, what do you ask a social media business consultant?
How long have you been using social tools? A good consultant will have been using social tools for quite a while, probably a year or two longer than they’ve actually been a consultant. If someone has only been doing this blogging for six months or a year, you might want to look much more closely at their experience, and make a decision as to whether you want to take a risk on them. They may be a natural, but they’re probably winging it.
Equally, do not believe anyone who says they’ve been doing it blogging forever. Blogs themselves are only ten years old. When I started consulting five years ago, I had only a handful of peers, and they are all very well known now. Any unknown who says they’ve been doing it consulting for more than six years is probably fibbing.
[Update: It’s been pointed out that this section was a bit fuzzy, so I’ve clarified what I mean by “doing it”! And yes, I know hand-coded blog-like websites have been around longer than ten years, but what makes blogging different from a website is the lightweight CMS that underpins it, and both LiveJournal and Blogger started in ’99.]
What was the first social tool you used? Most consultants who’ve been doing this for any length of time probably started off with a personal blog, because that was all that was around in those days. If they started off on Facebook, run away very quickly. If they started on Twitter, carefully examine their other experience.
What tools do you use on a regular basis? They should have at least one blog, a Twitter (or similar) account, and some sort of social network account. If they list every damn thing under the sun, it means that either they have no clients and therefore a lot of time to kill, or they are playing buzzword bingo with you. Realistically, it’s hard to go deep on more than three tools and a lot of the really important stuff is learnt only through focused engagement.
What sort of clients do you have? Expect a broad range of clients in many different sectors, and expect company sizes to range from tiny to multinational. Ask what type of engagements they were, and you should get similarly broad descriptions, from one hour presentations on upwards. Any consultant worth their salt has done a lot of work with very unsure clients who don’t want to spend too much money, because that’s just how the market has been (and still is).
Have you ever had a project that didn’t work out the way you anticipated? If the answer to this is not “Yes”, be suspicious. Good consultants have had to experiment because there isn’t a definitive guide to running social software projects. We know a lot more about what sort of things work now than we used to, but every new client has a new culture, and every new culture throws up new and sometimes surprising problems. Rarely do things go as planned, and you want someone who can think on their feet and adapt to changing circumstances.
What presentations have you given? This is a slightly nuanced question to ask, because not all knowledgeable people speak at conferences, but the more experienced someone is, the more likely they are to have done some speaking. Maybe it will be at conferences of their peers, or maybe it will be at small specialist meetings, or maybe it’s even a lunchtime talk for a business. I’m not really sure that barcamps count – they’re a great place for learning how to present, but they don’t necessarily indicate anything other than a desire to stand up in front of people and speak.
How do you measure success and recognise failure? The correct answer isn’t a stream of jargon about statistics and metrics, but instead should cover understanding the situation as it is before the new software is installed, having clear project goals, and critically examining what can be measured and what it might mean. There is no simple answer to this question, and if they suggest complicated metrics like “edits per page view per person”, then they’re not really thinking things through enough.
Of course, you should thoroughly Google any consultant before you contact them. You should easily be able to find:
- A professional site or LinkedIn/Xing (etc.) profile
- A blog, professional or personal
- A Twitter or other micro-conversation account
- Articles and blog posts that quote them
- Their name on conference speaker rosters
- Audio and/or video of talks they’ve given
Take the time to read through what other people say about them. Do they seem to be respected by their peers? Are they personable online? Can you build a sense of how much experience they have? What do they reveal about themselves as a person?
I wouldn’t worry about the age-old “Have they done work similar to the project I have in mind?” question, because to be honest, every project is a little bit different and what works perfectly for one company might not work in another, for cultural reasons.
Equally, don’t worry if they haven’t worked in your sector – social tools are cross-sector, and good consultants can work successful in any industry. I hate to say it, but your industry is unlikely to be so different that it genuinely takes specialist knowledge to work in. After all, we’re talking mainly about human qualities, such as openness, trust, or transparency, and these exist everywhere. (Also, anyone who tries to flog you sector-specific tools is probably talking out of their arse.)
Red flags
There are some thing that should make you immediately wary, however they are couched.
Promising the earth. Social media projects are neither fast nor easy, because they are centred not around technology but around behavioural change, and that takes time. Any consultant who promises a ‘quick win’ is promising something they can’t deliver.
‘Facebookitis’. Consultants whose only focus is Facebook are to be avoided. Facebook is great at what it does, which is help people organise their social lives and throw virtual sheep at each other. Internal business social networks are most useful tools only when they are designed to fulfil the needs of the user, which are likely to be different to those of the average Facebook user.
Too much focus on technology. Having the right tools is important, but it’s only 20% of the solution. The rest is about understanding and communicating with people about how these tools will make genuine improvements to their work life. If all the consultant talks about is tech, they’re not right for you.
Too much focus on launch. We are (or should be) long past the idea that all the hard work is done prior to a project launch, but this is especially true with social media projects. Getting things up and running is only the beginning – the hard work comes when you start focusing on adoption and long-term usage.
Hard questions to ask yourself
Before you start looking for help, there are some questions you should be asking yourself. If you can’t say “Yes” to these questions, perhaps you’re not ready to get a consultant of any sort in yet.
Are you in it for the long haul? As I’ve said, social media projects take time, and there’s no such thing as a quick win. If you’re not really interested in ongoing change, don’t run the project.
Are you capable of accepting hard truths? A good consultant won’t shy away from hard truths. They may have to tell you that your wonderful idea won’t work. Are you ready to hear that?
Are you willing to spend money on your people? I’ll say it again. Tech is only 20% of the problem – the rest is people. If you’re not willing to spend significant time and money working on understanding your people’s individual needs and helping them learn how these tools will help, don’t go ahead with the project. You can’t just throw mud against the wall and see what sticks – we know that doesn’t work, so don’t pretend it will.
Are you willing to eat your own dogfood? You want to get other people to use these tools, but do you?
It’s turned into a bit of a long post, and I hope that it’s been useful. Personally, I relish the idea that maybe one day I’ll turn up to a first meeting with a client, and they’ll have printed this post out and proceed to ask me what I’m proposing you ask your consultant. Am I willing to eat my own dogfood? Oh yes!!
links for 2009-02-06
-
Kevin: A list of the 5 best data visualisation projects of the year. Last.fm, BBC, Wordle. I liked the New York Museum of Modern Art's project exploring the world of online dating.
-
Kevin: Hat tip to Adam Tinworth. This is a wonderful visualisation of air traffic over the UK in a 24 hour period. Lovely stuff, and it really helps tell a story.
-
Kevin: "Is social media diplomatic window dressing or can the U.S. Twitter its way into the hearts and minds of other countries?" It's a lot more complicated than that, and many US foreign service staff will admit quietly that they've had a difficult time with public diplomacy during the Bush administration. But with Obama's social media efforts domestically, it will see if he tries to bring some social networking skills to US image rebuilding and repair.
-
Kevin: How to spot the real experts from those only expert at self-promotion.
-
Kevin: My friend and former colleague says it straight. "There is no reason to assume that print is the only or even the best vehicle for investigative journalism. The newspaper is a delivery vehicle for news. For a younger generation, that delivery vehicle is the internet."
-
Kevin: Alana Taylor reports on a panel about a MediaBistro panel talking about social media in general and about Twitter more specifically. NPR's Andy Carvin, BusinessWeek.com community editor Shirley Brady and Daily Beast columnist Rachel Sklar talk about why they use it. Also, Jay Rosen worries (but not too much) about finding a business model for news as we're in a platform shift, but he sees many possibilities with Twitter.
-
Kevin: Question and answers surrounding the copyfight over the now iconic Hope and Progress Barack Obama posters. The photographer is looking for some money but money that he plans to donate to charity. He's more interested in the recognition.
-
Kevin: A nice interactive graphic from the NYTimes showing Twiter keywords by state and over time